Escherichia coli Infection (2024)

Continuing Education Activity

Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a gram-negative bacillus that is a causative organism of many diarrheal illnesses, including traveler’s diarrhea and dysentery. E. coli is the most common pathogen leading to uncomplicated cystitis, and also results in other extraintestinal illnesses, including pneumonia, bacteremia, and abdominal infections such as spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Illness caused by E. coli have a significant burden on patients and the healthcare system, so prompt recognition, and appropriate treatment are necessary. This activity reviews the different E. coli strains that cause human illness and describes how to identify and treat these illnesses and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in the care of patients with this condition.

Objectives:

• Identify the etiology of illnesses caused by Escherichia coli.

• Review the appropriate evaluation process for Escherichia coli infection.

• Outline the management options available for illnesses caused by Escherichia coli.

• Summarize the importance of collaboration amongst the interprofessional team to enhance the care of patients with Escherichia coli infection.

Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.

Introduction

Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a gram-negative bacillus known to be a part of normal intestinal flora but can also be the cause of intestinal and extraintestinal illness in humans. There are hundreds of identified E. coli strains, resulting in a spectrum of disease from mild, self-limited gastroenteritis to renal failure and septic shock. Its virulence lends to E. coli’s ability to evade host defenses and develop resistance to common antibiotics. This review will divide E. coli infections into those causing intestinal illness and those causing extraintestinal illness.

Intestinal illnesses will be described by the causative E. coli subtypes, including enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC), which is also known as Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and will be referred to as EHEC/STEC, enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC), enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), and enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC).[1] Extraintestinal illnesses will be described based on clinical disease.

Etiology

E. coli is part of commensal intestinal flora and is also found on the floors of hospitals and long-term care facilities. E. coli is the most common gram-negative bacteria in the human gastrointestinal tract and lacks virulence in this setting. However, when found outside of the intestinal tract, E. coli can cause urinary tract infections (UTI), pneumonia, bacteremia, and peritonitis, among others.[2][3][4]

E. coli is a major cause of nosocomial infections, including catheter-associated UTIs and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).[5]E. coli can also be found in soil, on vegetables, and in water, as well asin undercooked meats. Pathogenic strains cause intestinal illness in humans when ingested.

Epidemiology

Escherichia coli results in intestinal illness as well as infection outside of the intestine. Intestinal illness caused by E. coliis caused by one of fivesubtypes, and they areidentified according to their O and H antigens. The O antigen is determined by a repeating polysaccharide chain present in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) outer membrane, and the flagellum determines the H antigen.[1]

• ETEC causes watery diarrhea in resource-limited settings and is commonly found in food and water in areas without adequate sanitation.Approximately100,000,000 organismsmust be ingested to cause illness in a healthy person. It is the single most important organism causing traveler’s diarrhea. ETEC is also a significant contributor to dehydrating diarrheal illness in infants and children in resource-limited settings.[6]

• EPEC was the first E. coli pathotype identified as a causative agent of watery diarrhea primarily in infants and young children in resource-limited settings and is responsible for sporadic and epidemic outbreaks.[7]Diarrheal illness caused by EPEC is most commonly contracted through ingestion but can also be spread person-to-person.[8]

• EAEC is a causative organism of acute and chronic watery diarrhea in resource-limited and resource-rich regions and recently has been increasingly identified as a cause of traveler’s diarrhea.[9][10]

• EHEC/STEC produces Shiga-toxin andincludes serotypes O157:H7, as well as others.[11][12][13]EHEC/STEC has been responsible for large diarrheal outbreaks after ingesting contaminated produce (e.g., spinach, sprouts, lettuce, fruit) and undercooked beef. EHEC/STEC is linked to the consumption of raw dairy products. EHEC/STEC is commonly found in ground beef, which can be contaminated during processing. Vegetables are contaminated when crops are fertilized with manure containing EHEC/STEC, and water runoff from these crops leads to EHEC/STEC found in water systems. Relatively low inoculums (102 CFU) result in illness, facilitating the ease of transmission from the environment to humans and humans to humans.[14][15]The World Health Organization reports there are roughly 2.8 million cases of EHEC/STEC infections globally as of 2014.[16]According to the CDC, there were reportedly 3,127 cases in the United States in 2019.[17]While the number of reported cases of O157:H7 declined in the United States in 2019, the number of non-O157:H7 EHEC/STEC cases rose by 35% compared to the previous year. This is likely due to more readily available PCR-based assays to identify organisms that allow laboratories to distinguish E. coli O157:H7 from non-O157:H7 strains. EHEC/STEC infections are common across all age groups, but hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) resulting from EHEC/STEC infections is most common in children less than five years old and adults greater than 60 years old.

• EIEC-induced diarrheal illness is uncommon due in part to the relatively large inoculum required, although recent studiessuggestEIEC-induced diarrhea may be underdiagnosed. EIEC is closely related to Shigella and is contracted through ingesting undercooked meats and contaminated vegetables.[18]

Extraintestinal illness caused by E. coli results from a translocation of gut bacteria into other parts of the body or the environmental spread in hospitals and long term care facilities. E. coli is the predominant gram-negative bacteria to cause extraintestinal illness in humans and can cause urinary tract infection, abdominal and pelvic infection, pneumonia, bacteremia, and meningitis, among others.

Pathophysiology

Intestinal illness caused by E. coli results from the ingestion of bacteria and the innate ability of E. colito overcome host defenses. Gram-negative bacteria are characterized by their cell envelope, which comprises an inner cytoplasmic cell membrane, peptidoglycan cell wall, and outer membrane. The outer membrane is made of a lipid bilayer, associated proteins, and lipopolysaccharide (LPS), resulting in a toxic reaction if lysed. Pathogenic E. coli strains each has distinctive virulence factors encoded on plasmids, transposons, and bacteriophages.

• ETEC: Colonizing fimbriae expressed by ETEC enable the bacteria to attach to the intestinal wall. Once connected, ETEC expresses a heat-labile toxin (LT) and/or heat-stable toxin (ST), which are secretory toxins encoded on plasmids.[19]LT stimulates adenylate cyclase leading to increased intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and the subsequent chloride secretion from intestinal crypt cells. This mechanism also inhibits intestinal villi from absorbing sodium chloride. This process leads to free water secretion into the intestinal lumen, thus producing watery diarrhea. ST stimulates guanylate cyclase leading to increased intracellular cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) and the subsequent chloride secretion and inhibition of sodium chloride absorption, thus producing watery diarrhea.

• EPEC: A bundle-forming pilus (BFP) is encoded by the plasmid (pEAF), enabling EPEC to form a localized attachment to enterocytes in the small intestine. Once bound, the outer membrane protein colonization factor, intimin, facilitates enhanced adherence. Intimin is an outer membrane protein colonization factor encoded on the eae gene within the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) chromosomal island. The LEE chromosomal island elaborates approximately 20 secretory toxins that are injected in the enterocyte by a type III injectisome.[20][21]These toxins result in a series of events, ultimately leading to the characteristic effacement of microvilli, increased permeability of tight junctions, and alterations in water and electrolyte secretion and absorption. EspF is a LEE-secreted protein that is not involved with attaching and effacing. It appears to disrupt the intestinal barrier function by increasing monolayer permeability via alteration of electrical resistance. EspF has several protein-protein interaction domains that may function by interacting with endocytic regulation. Two other secreted proteins, EspG and EspG2, inhibit luminal membrane chloride absorption by decreasing surface expression of the Cl-/OH-exchanger via disruption of microtubules.

• EAEC: EAEC exhibits a stacked brick pattern of adherence to epithelial cells. The virulence plasmid encodes the transcriptional activator AggR which activates several virulence factors, although scientific understanding of this process is not complete.[22]AggR likely induces aggregative adherence fimbriae (AAF/I-III), adhesin, surface protein dispersin, and the enterotoxins Pet, EAST-1, ShET1, and ShET2. Dispersin likely promotes AAF-mediated colonization.[23]

• EHEC/STEC: EHEC/STEC produces bloody diarrhea due to its ability to express Shiga toxin 1 (Stx1) and or Shiga toxin 2 (Stx2).[24][25]Stx1 and Stx2 are closely related to Shiga toxin (Stx) produced by Shigella dysenteriae. EHEC/STEC, which expresses Stx2, results in bloody diarrhea and may also express Stx1, while bacteria that do not express Stx2 do not induce bloody diarrhea. The Stxs are a group of bacterial AB protein toxins composed of one A subunit and five identical B subunits capable of inhibiting protein synthesis through their ability to target eukaryotic ribosomes. The A subunit is responsible for inhibiting protein synthesis while the B pentamer binds glycosphingolipid Gb3, a cellular receptor on endothelial cells. The inhibition of protein synthesis results in enterocyte cell death and subsequent inflammatory colitis. The EHEC/STEC genome also encodes intimin, which is its primary adhesin, and EHEC/STEC possesses a plasmid (pO157) that expresses a pore-forming toxin termed EHEC-hemolysin.[26][27]Once EHEC/STEC attach and produce localized intestinal damage, the Stx toxins enter the host and travel to target organ epithelial cells. Glomerular epithelial cells undergo similar damage as enterocytes, and as a result of cell death, detach from the glomerular membrane. This inflammatory state results in thrombosis and activation of the coagulation cascade yielding subsequent thrombocytopenia, anemia, and renal damage, the HUS triad. EHEC/STEC is also known for its ability to induce hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). HUS is characterized by the triad of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA), thrombocytopenia, and renal insufficiency.

• EIEC: Like EHEC, enterotoxins induce secretory diarrhea. Subsequent colonization and invasion of colonic mucosa, replication, cell-to-cell spread result in inflammatory colitis.[18]

Extraintestinal infections caused by E. coli are generally the result of the translocation of commensal E. colioutside of the intestine. The urinary tract is the most common extraintestinal site of infection caused by E. coli. UTIs are a significant reason for ambulatory care visits in the US and is the second most common cause of hospitalizationafter pneumonia.[28][29]Urinary tract infections from E. coli result from bacteria ascending the urethra and are more common in women than men, given the proximity of the urethra. Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) caused by E. coli is common, but ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is more common.[30]Hospitalized patients, particularly those on mechanical ventilation, are at an increased risk of aspirating gastric contents. E. coli bacteremia is often the result of a primary E. coli infection at another site. Community-acquired E. colibacteremia is most frequently the result of urinary tract infections in older adults, while hospitalized patients likely develop bacteremia as a result of lower respiratory tract infection.

History and Physical

An in-depth history and physical exam are important in establishing the diagnosis of E. coli infection. Symptom onset, duration, and severity, as well as any alleviating and aggravating factors, including any over-the-counter medications trialed, may help distinguish it from other intestinal illnesses. It is especially important to distinguish between watery and bloody diarrhea and to ask about recent travel and diet history, which may provide clues to suggest E. coli as the etiology of illness. ETEC is the most common bacterial cause of traveler's diarrhea, and management relies on high clinical suspicion. Symptoms usually start more than 16 hours after the ingestion of contaminated food, whereas diarrheal illness caused by organismsother than E. coli mayhave onset much more rapidly. If a patient presents with an extraintestinal manifestation of E. coli,it's essential to ask about prior infections and assess for the risk of drug-resistant organisms. When a patient presents with symptoms consistent with cystitis, it's also important to know about indwelling instrumentation, such asureteral stents orFoley catheters.

The physical exam allows health practitioners to assess the severity of illness.Patients presenting with vital signs suggestive of systemic disease should be cared for in an appropriate setting, such as a hospital-based emergency department or in-patient ward where comprehensive care can be provided. All patients should be assessed for clinical signs of dehydration by evaluating mucous membranes and skin turgor. Clinicians should auscultate the heart and lungs in all patients suspected of disease caused byE. coli.Finally, a focused exam should support the patient-provided history that may yield additional findings to guide patient care. Patients presenting with intestinal and genitourinary symptoms should have a thorough abdominal exam performed,whereas patients suspected of having sepsis caused byE. colishould undergo a comprehensive physical exam.

Evaluation

Routine laboratory evaluation is not generally required in well-appearing patients with diarrheal illness as the diseaseis often self-limiting. However, they may support clinical suspicion and guide treatment in patients with concerning signs or symptoms suggesting systemic illness. Patients with suspected EHEC/STEC infection should have a baseline complete blood count (CBC) and a basic metabolic panel (BMP) obtained. Obtain stool cultures in patients with prolonged diarrheal illness, in patients with systemic signs or symptoms, and those with dysentery.[31] Pathogenic E. coli are not distinguishable from one another based solely on appearance; therefore, further biochemical tests are necessary.

E. coliare non-spore-forming, flagellated, and facultatively anaerobic.Theyhave the inherent ability to ferment lactose and produce indole, and before PCR-based assays, E. coli were identified via selective culture media.[1]E. coliare classically grown on MacConkey agar, culture media containing lactose. E. coli also produces indole during metabolism, and bacterial growth on MacConkey agar with indole production is diagnostic for E. coli. EHEC/STEC can also ferment sorbitol. Therefore, to further distinguish EHEC/STEC from other E. coli strains, bacteria are grown on sorbitol-containing media. Interestingly, non-O157:H7 EHEC strains that do not ferment sorbitol have recently been identified by PCR. As PCR-based assays become more readily available, these strains will continue to be more frequently identified. All patients with inflammatory diarrhea acquired outside of the United States should have stool cultured for E. coli, as well as Salmonella, Shigella, and Campylobacter.

While molecular diagnosis is not required in mild illness, specific pathogens can be identified via PCR-based assays. ETEC is distinguished by the identification of LT and ST genes.EPEC is identified by the detection of the pEAF plasmid or its encoded BFP factor. EAEC is identified through the detection of the AggR regulon. EHEC/STEC is identified through the nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) of Shiga toxin 1 (Stx1) and Shiga toxin 2 (Stx2).[32]EIEC can be detected via NAAT. Many EIEC strains are identified by the presence of the lacY gene, which encodes lactose permease.

Summary

• E. coli

  • Gram-negative bacilli, non-spore-forming, flagellated, facultatively anaerobic

  • Ferments lactose (grows on MacConkey agar)

  • Catalase positive

  • Oxidase negative

• ETEC

  • Culture: MacConkey agar, indole producing

  • Molecular diagnosis: LT or ST genes

• EHEC/STEC

  • Culture

    • O157:H7: Sorbitol-MacConkey agar, indole producing

    • Non-0157:H7: MacConkey agar

  • Molecular diagnosis: NAAT of Stx1 and Stx2

• EIEC

  See Also

  Escherichia coli (E. coli) - MN Dept. of HealthE. coli - Symptoms and causesIs E. coli a type of STD? - Dr Ben Medical - Men's Health Clinic | Women's Health SingaporeHighlighting the long-term health consequences of E.Coli O157 | Ecoli

  • Culture: MacConkey agar (glucose and xylose), indole producing

  • Molecular: NAAT of lacY

• EPEC

  • Culture: MacConkey agar, indole producing

  • Molecular diagnosis: pEAF plasmid or BFP factor

• EAEC

  • Culture: MacConkey agar, indole producing

  • Molecular diagnosis: AggR regulon

For patients with extraintestinal illness, culturing blood, urine, or sputum will identify E. coli. Many gram-negative bacilli have developed antibiotic resistance genes, and E. coli is no exception. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) -producing E. coli confer resistance to most beta-lactamase antibiotics (e.g., cephalosporins, monobactams, etc.). In contrast, carbapenemase-producing E. colistrains possess genes conferring resistance to carbapenems (e.g., imipenem, ertapenem, and meropenem).

Treatment / Management

Treatment is dependent on the strain, as well as the illness. Care of the patient with an intestinal disease caused by E. coli begins with symptomatic management.[31][33]Diarrheal illness can be extremely distressing for patients. Experts recommend rehydration and antidiarrheals as the mainstays of treatment for mild disease. Oral rehydration is recommended first-line therapy for all patients with diarrheal illness when tolerated and is equally efficacious as compared to intravenous hydration (IV).IV hydration is recommended when patients cannot tolerate oral intake. Distressing symptoms are treated with antimotility agents such as bismuth-subsalicylate and loperamide.

Antibiotics are not recommended as first-line treatment for diarrheal illness caused byE. colifor most patients due to the harmful side effects and association with antibiotic resistance. For patients with severe disease (e.g., more than six stools per day, fever, dehydration necessitating hospitalization, diarrhea lasting more than seven days, or bloody diarrhea), antibiotics may be reasonable. Rifaximin, azithromycin, and ciprofloxacin are currently recommended by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the International Society of Travel Medicine (ISTM) to treatE. coli diarrheal illness. For patients suspected of having EHEC/STEC, antibiotics are not recommended, especially in children and older adults, due to the increased risk of hemolytic uremic syndrome.

Summary of Treatment

Watery Diarrhea

• Rehydration

  • Oral fluids, if tolerated

  • IV fluids if oral fluids not tolerated

• Antimotility agents

  • Bismuth salicylate

    • Adults: 524 mg every 30 min for up to 8 doses

    • Children

      • 12-18 years: 524 mg every 30 min up to 8 doses

      • <12 years: limited data available

  • Loperamide:

    • 4 mg, then 2 mg following each unformed stool.

    • Max dose 16 mg per day (prescription), 8 mg (OTC).

    • Duration: no more than two days

    • Children: Not recommended for infectious diarrhea

• Antibiotics

  • May be prescribed when >2 unformed stools per day

  • Adults

    • Fluoroquinolones

      • Ciprofloxacin: 750 mg once; or 500 mg BID for three days

      • Levofloxacin: 500 mg once; or 500 mg daily for three days

    • Azithromycin: 1,000 mg once; or 500 mg daily for three days

    • Rifaximin: 400 mg BID or 200 mg TID for three days

  • Children

    • Azithromycin: 10 mg/kg on day 1, 5 mg/kg on days 2 and 3

Bloody Diarrhea

• Rehydration

  • Oral fluids, if tolerated

  • IV fluids if oral fluids not tolerated or clinically indicated

• Antimotility agents

  • Not recommended for patients with dysentery as these may prolong illness

    See Also

    E. coli effects can last a lifetime

• Antibiotics

  • Not recommended for patients with presumed EHEC/STEC

  • Adults

    • Fluoroquinolones

      • Ciprofloxacin: 750 mg once; or 500 mg BID for three days

      • Levofloxacin: 500 mg once; or 500 mg daily for three days

    • Azithromycin: 1,000 mg once; or 500 mg daily for three days

    • Rifaximin: 400 mg BID or 200 mg TID for three days

  • Children

    • Azithromycin: 10 mg/kg on day 1, 5 mg/kg on days 2 and 3

EHEC/STEC

Patients identified as having EHEC/STEC, particularly children less than 12 years of age, should be hospitalized. Hospitalization reduces the risk of community spread and allows for aggressive therapy and close monitoring.[34] Hospitalized patients should receive intravenous hydration with isotonic fluids (0.9% NaCl or Lactated Ringer's).[35]Antibiotics, as previously mentioned, are not routinely recommended for patients with confirmed EHEC/STEC infections due to the increased risk of HUS.[36]Unlike other diarrheal illnesses, antimotility agents may increase the risk of HUS in patients with EHEC/STEC infections and should not be recommended. It is also essential to avoid other medications that could worsen renal function, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Patients with EHEC/STEC-induced HUS commonly develop hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia and may require transfusion. These patients experience ongoing hemolysis and should not receive blood transfusions early in illness unless they are hemodynamically unstable. Platelet transfusion should also be avoided unless severe thrombocytopenia or bleeding due to the increased risk of thrombosis associated with HUS.

Extraintestinal Illness

Antimicrobial therapy directed against E. coli should be based on local antibiograms demonstrating susceptibility and resistance patterns. Choosing between oral and intravenous formulations is disease-specific and should be guided by clinical presentation. In general, extraintestinal infections caused by E. coli are susceptible to a variety of antibiotics, as listed below. E. coli can harbor genes for antibiotic resistance, and antibiotic therapy targeting these organisms must be tailored.

• Antibiotics suitable for E. coli infections

  • Beta-lactam antibiotics

    • Cephalosporins

    • Carbapenems

    • Monobactams

  • Nitrofurantoin

  • Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

  • Fosfomycin

  • Fluoroquinolones

• ESBL-producing E. coli (Antibiotic choice is dependent on local resistance patterns)

  • Cefepime

  • Ceftazidime

  • Imipenem

  • Ertapenem

  • Meropenem

• Carbapenemase-producing E. coli

  • Ceftazidime-avibactam

  • Colistin

  • Polymyxin B

Differential Diagnosis

Intestinal illness can be caused by a variety of organisms. Watery diarrheal illness is most commonly caused by viruses, including norovirus and rotavirus, but can also be caused by bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, and Vibrio cholerae, among others. For patients presenting with inflammatory or bloody diarrhea, it’s important to consider etiologies including Shigella spp, Salmonella spp, Campylobacter jejuni, and Yersinia enterocolitica, among others. Extraintestinal infections previously discussed can be caused by a variety of viruses and bacteria and are dependent on the specific illness.

Prognosis

Most diarrheal illnesses have a favorable prognosis, and those caused by E. coli are no different. E. coliinfections resulting in watery diarrhea are generally self-limited, but even when antibiotics are required, the illness is treatable, and patients make a full recovery. Children who develop HUS due to EHEC/STEC are at the most significant risk for morbidity and mortality. Approximately four percent of children who develop EHEC/STEC-induced HUS will die, and another five percent will develop significant long-term sequelae, including end-stage renal disease and stroke.[37][38] Another 20 to 30 percent will develop other sequelae; those who do not suffer the harmful effects often make a full recovery within two weeks.[39][40][41]

The prognosis of patients who develop extraintestinal infections caused by E. coli is dependent on comorbid conditions. E. coli itself is not an indicator of poor prognosis. However, patients with extraintestinal infections caused by E. coli (except cystitis) are generally sicker at baseline. For example, E. coli is a common cause of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in patients with ascites, and even when treated, SBP is associated with up to a four percent mortality risk.[42]

Complications

Patients who develop diarrheal illness are at an increased risk for dehydration, but this can often be prevented through adequate hydration and early symptomatic intervention. Long-term complications include chronic diarrhea and irritable bowel syndrome, but these occur in a small number of patients. Patients with EHEC/STEC diarrheal illness are at risk for developing hemolytic uremic syndrome, which is more common in children less than five years old and adults older than 60.

The risk of developing HUS is dependent on a number of factors, including Stx gene expression, and in infections caused by Stx2-expressing EHEC/STEC, the risk of HUS may be as high as 24%. Children who develop EHEC/STEC induced HUS are the greatest risk for long-term sequelae. As previously mentioned, approximately five percent will develop end-stage renal disease or stroke, and another 20 to 30 percent will develop sequelae, including hypertension, proteinuria, and subclinical decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Complications associated with extraintestinal E. coli infections are disease-specific and out of the scope of this review.

Deterrence and Patient Education

Illnesses caused by E. coli can be prevented by regular hand washing, washing fruits and vegetables, and thoroughly cooking meat. When traveling to areas with inadequate sanitation practices, such as in many developing regions, illness can be avoided through consuming purified water and thoroughly cooking food or by rinsing raw fruits and vegetables in purified water. When infection cannot be avoided, or patients are at high risk for complications of diarrheal illness (e.g., immunosuppressed), prophylactic antibiotics can significantly reduce disease. The ISTM recommends travelers at risk for contracting diarrheal illnesses who require antibiotic prophylaxis should take rifaximin or bismuth-subsalicylate for chemoprophylaxis.[33]

• Rifaximin: 200 mg 1-3 times daily for the duration of travel; not to exceed two weeks (first line)

• Bismuth-subsalicylate: 524 mg every 30 – 60 minutes as needed up to 8 doses in 24 hours (second line)

Reducing the risk of extraintestinal infections is disease-specific but includes interventions such as reducing the use of indwelling medical devices to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Developing ICU protocols to reduce aspiration risks, including elevating the patient’s head of the bed to 30 degrees, leads to lower rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia.[43]Chemoprophylaxis minimizes the risk of SBP in high-risk groups.[44]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Diarrheal illness caused by E. coli is commonly self-limited. However, an interprofessional team composed of the primary clinicians, infectious disease specialists, pharmacy, and the laboratory team can rapidly identify the etiology of illness and guide effective therapy in patients hospitalized with severe illness. Nurses are integral team members whose frequent assessments can quickly identify a change in clinical status. Nurses can also enhance communication between patients and the healthcare team, which leads to a better understanding, increased satisfaction, and better compliance with outpatient therapies.[45]

Clinicians trained in travel medicine can identify candidates for chemoprophylaxis to traveler’s diarrhea and help initiate appropriate therapy.[46]Travel clinics are readily available in many urban areas and are staffed with clinicians and nursing staff who can discuss and prescribe chemoprophylaxis based on the most recent recommendations. These clinicians can also take time with patients to discuss how to avoid contracting an illness while traveling.

Review Questions

• Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.

• Comment on this article.

References

1.

Nataro JP, Kaper JB. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998 Jan;11(1):142-201. [PMC free article: PMC121379] [PubMed: 9457432]

2.

Mylotte JM, Tayara A, Goodnough S. Epidemiology of bloodstream infection in nursing home residents: evaluation in a large cohort from multiple homes. Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Dec 15;35(12):1484-90. [PubMed: 12471567]

3.

McCue JD. Gram-negative bacillary bacteremia in the elderly: incidence, ecology, etiology, and mortality. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1987 Mar;35(3):213-8. [PubMed: 3819260]

4.

Jain S, Self WH, Wunderink RG, Fakhran S, Balk R, Bramley AM, Reed C, Grijalva CG, Anderson EJ, Courtney DM, Chappell JD, Qi C, Hart EM, Carroll F, Trabue C, Donnelly HK, Williams DJ, Zhu Y, Arnold SR, Ampofo K, Waterer GW, Levine M, Lindstrom S, Winchell JM, Katz JM, Erdman D, Schneider E, Hicks LA, McCullers JA, Pavia AT, Edwards KM, Finelli L., CDC EPIC Study Team. Community-Acquired Pneumonia Requiring Hospitalization among U.S. Adults. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 30;373(5):415-27. [PMC free article: PMC4728150] [PubMed: 26172429]

5.

Sligl W, Taylor G, Brindley PG. Five years of nosocomial Gram-negative bacteremia in a general intensive care unit: epidemiology, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, and outcomes. Int J Infect Dis. 2006 Jul;10(4):320-5. [PubMed: 16460982]

6.

Kotloff KL, Nataro JP, Blackwelder WC, Nasrin D, Farag TH, Panchalingam S, Wu Y, Sow SO, Sur D, Breiman RF, Faruque AS, Zaidi AK, Saha D, Alonso PL, Tamboura B, Sanogo D, Onwuchekwa U, Manna B, Ramamurthy T, Kanungo S, Ochieng JB, Omore R, Oundo JO, Hossain A, Das SK, Ahmed S, Qureshi S, Quadri F, Adegbola RA, Antonio M, Hossain MJ, Akinsola A, Mandomando I, Nhampossa T, Acácio S, Biswas K, O'Reilly CE, Mintz ED, Berkeley LY, Muhsen K, Sommerfelt H, Robins-Browne RM, Levine MM. Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in infants and young children in developing countries (the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, GEMS): a prospective, case-control study. Lancet. 2013 Jul 20;382(9888):209-22. [PubMed: 23680352]

7.

Ochoa TJ, Contreras CA. Enteropathogenic escherichia coli infection in children. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2011 Oct;24(5):478-83. [PMC free article: PMC3277943] [PubMed: 21857511]

8.

Regua AH, Bravo VL, Leal MC, Lobo Leite ME. Epidemiological survey of the enteropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from children with diarrhoea. J Trop Pediatr. 1990 Aug;36(4):176-9. [PubMed: 2213982]

9.

Huang DB, Nataro JP, DuPont HL, Kamat PP, Mhatre AD, Okhuysen PC, Chiang T. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli is a cause of acute diarrheal illness: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Sep 01;43(5):556-63. [PubMed: 16886146]

10.

de la Cabada Bauche J, Dupont HL. New Developments in Traveler's Diarrhea. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2011 Feb;7(2):88-95. [PMC free article: PMC3061023] [PubMed: 21475415]

11.

Karch H, Bielaszewska M. Sorbitol-fermenting Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H(-) strains: epidemiology, phenotypic and molecular characteristics, and microbiological diagnosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jun;39(6):2043-9. [PMC free article: PMC88086] [PubMed: 11376032]

12.

Tarr PI. Escherichia coli O157:H7: clinical, diagnostic, and epidemiological aspects of human infection. Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Jan;20(1):1-8; quiz 9-10. [PubMed: 7727633]

13.

Mead PS, Griffin PM. Escherichia coli O157:H7. Lancet. 1998 Oct 10;352(9135):1207-12. [PubMed: 9777854]

14.

Boyce TG, Swerdlow DL, Griffin PM. Escherichia coli O157:H7 and the hemolytic-uremic syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1995 Aug 10;333(6):364-8. [PubMed: 7609755]

15.

Raffaelli RM, Paladini M, Hanson H, Kornstein L, Agasan A, Slavinski S, Weiss D, Fennelly GJ, Flynn JT. Child care-associated outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and hemolytic uremic syndrome. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007 Oct;26(10):951-3. [PubMed: 17901803]

16.

Majowicz SE, Scallan E, Jones-Bitton A, Sargeant JM, Stapleton J, Angulo FJ, Yeung DH, Kirk MD. Global incidence of human Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections and deaths: a systematic review and knowledge synthesis. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2014 Jun;11(6):447-55. [PMC free article: PMC4607253] [PubMed: 24750096]

17.

Tack DM, Ray L, Griffin PM, Cieslak PR, Dunn J, Rissman T, Jervis R, Lathrop S, Muse A, Duwell M, Smith K, Tobin-D'Angelo M, Vugia DJ, Zablotsky Kufel J, Wolpert BJ, Tauxe R, Payne DC. Preliminary Incidence and Trends of Infections with Pathogens Transmitted Commonly Through Food - Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 10 U.S. Sites, 2016-2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 May 01;69(17):509-514. [PMC free article: PMC7206985] [PubMed: 32352955]

18.

Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Mobley HL. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004 Feb;2(2):123-40. [PubMed: 15040260]

19.

Levine MM, Caplan ES, Waterman D, Cash RA, Hornick RB, Snyder MJ. Diarrhea caused by Escherichia coli that produce only heat-stable enterotoxin. Infect Immun. 1977 Jul;17(1):78-82. [PMC free article: PMC421084] [PubMed: 328397]

20.

Pinaud L, Sansonetti PJ, Phalipon A. Host Cell Targeting by Enteropathogenic Bacteria T3SS Effectors. Trends Microbiol. 2018 Apr;26(4):266-283. [PubMed: 29477730]

21.

Gaytán MO, Martínez-Santos VI, Soto E, González-Pedrajo B. Type Three Secretion System in Attaching and Effacing Pathogens. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2016;6:129. [PMC free article: PMC5073101] [PubMed: 27818950]

22.

Nataro JP. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli pathogenesis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2005 Jan;21(1):4-8. [PubMed: 15687877]

23.

Morin N, Santiago AE, Ernst RK, Guillot SJ, Nataro JP. Characterization of the AggR regulon in enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 2013 Jan;81(1):122-32. [PMC free article: PMC3536136] [PubMed: 23090962]

24.

Melton-Celsa AR. Shiga Toxin (Stx) Classification, Structure, and Function. Microbiol Spectr. 2014 Aug;2(4):EHEC-0024-2013. [PMC free article: PMC4270005] [PubMed: 25530917]

25.

Perna NT, Plunkett G, Burland V, Mau B, Glasner JD, Rose DJ, Mayhew GF, Evans PS, Gregor J, Kirkpatrick HA, Pósfai G, Hackett J, Klink S, Boutin A, Shao Y, Miller L, Grotbeck EJ, Davis NW, Lim A, Dimalanta ET, Potamousis KD, Apodaca J, Anantharaman TS, Lin J, Yen G, Schwartz DC, Welch RA, Blattner FR. Genome sequence of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Nature. 2001 Jan 25;409(6819):529-33. [PubMed: 11206551]

26.

Stevens MP, Frankel GM. The Locus of Enterocyte Effacement and Associated Virulence Factors of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Microbiol Spectr. 2014 Aug;2(4):EHEC-0007-2013. [PubMed: 26104209]

27.

Bielaszewska M, Aldick T, Bauwens A, Karch H. Hemolysin of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli: structure, transport, biological activity and putative role in virulence. Int J Med Microbiol. 2014 Jul;304(5-6):521-9. [PubMed: 24933303]

28.

Takhar SS, Moran GJ. Diagnosis and management of urinary tract infection in the emergency department and outpatient settings. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2014 Mar;28(1):33-48. [PubMed: 24484573]

29.

Hsieh VC, Hsieh ML, Chiang JH, Chien A, Hsieh MS. Emergency Department Visits and Disease Burden Attributable to Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions in Elderly Adults. Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 07;9(1):3811. [PMC free article: PMC6405841] [PubMed: 30846843]

30.

Sievert DM, Ricks P, Edwards JR, Schneider A, Patel J, Srinivasan A, Kallen A, Limbago B, Fridkin S., National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Team and Participating NHSN Facilities. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009-2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Jan;34(1):1-14. [PubMed: 23221186]

31.

Shane AL, Mody RK, Crump JA, Tarr PI, Steiner TS, Kotloff K, Langley JM, Wanke C, Warren CA, Cheng AC, Cantey J, Pickering LK. 2017 Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Infectious Diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 29;65(12):e45-e80. [PMC free article: PMC5850553] [PubMed: 29053792]

32.

Anderson NW, Tarr PI. Multiplex Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing to Diagnose Gut Infections: Challenges, Opportunities, and Result Interpretation. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2018 Dec;47(4):793-812. [PubMed: 30337033]

33.

Riddle MS, Connor BA, Beeching NJ, DuPont HL, Hamer DH, Kozarsky P, Libman M, Steffen R, Taylor D, Tribble DR, Vila J, Zanger P, Ericsson CD. Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of travelers' diarrhea: a graded expert panel report. J Travel Med. 2017 Apr 01;24(suppl_1):S57-S74. [PMC free article: PMC5731448] [PubMed: 28521004]

34.

Werber D, Mason BW, Evans MR, Salmon RL. Preventing household transmission of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 infection: promptly separating siblings might be the key. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Apr 15;46(8):1189-96. [PubMed: 18444854]

35.

Grisaru S, Xie J, Samuel S, Hartling L, Tarr PI, Schnadower D, Freedman SB., Alberta Provincial Pediatric Enteric Infection Team. Associations Between Hydration Status, Intravenous Fluid Administration, and Outcomes of Patients Infected With Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Jan 01;171(1):68-76. [PubMed: 27893870]

36.

Freedman SB, Xie J, Neufeld MS, Hamilton WL, Hartling L, Tarr PI, Alberta Provincial Pediatric Enteric Infection Team (APPETITE). Nettel-Aguirre A, Chuck A, Lee B, Johnson D, Currie G, Talbot J, Jiang J, Dickinson J, Kellner J, MacDonald J, Svenson L, Chui L, Louie M, Lavoie M, Eltorki M, Vanderkooi O, Tellier R, Ali S, Drews S, Graham T, Pang XL. Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Infection, Antibiotics, and Risk of Developing Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 May 15;62(10):1251-1258. [PMC free article: PMC4845788] [PubMed: 26917812]

37.

Mody RK, Gu W, Griffin PM, Jones TF, Rounds J, Shiferaw B, Tobin-D'Angelo M, Smith G, Spina N, Hurd S, Lathrop S, Palmer A, Boothe E, Luna-Gierke RE, Hoekstra RM. Postdiarrheal hemolytic uremic syndrome in United States children: clinical spectrum and predictors of in-hospital death. J Pediatr. 2015 Apr;166(4):1022-9. [PubMed: 25661408]

38.

Alconcher LF, Coccia PA, Suarez ADC, Monteverde ML, Perez Y Gutiérrez MG, Carlopio PM, Missoni ML, Balestracci A, Principi I, Ramírez FB, Estrella P, Micelli S, Leroy DC, Quijada NE, Seminara C, Giordano MI, Hidalgo Solís SB, Saurit M, Caminitti A, Arias A, Rivas M, Risso P, Liern M. Hyponatremia: a new predictor of mortality in patients with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli hemolytic uremic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 2018 Oct;33(10):1791-1798. [PubMed: 29961127]

39.

Spinale JM, Ruebner RL, Copelovitch L, Kaplan BS. Long-term outcomes of Shiga toxin hemolytic uremic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 2013 Nov;28(11):2097-105. [PubMed: 23288350]

40.

Loos S, Aulbert W, Hoppe B, Ahlenstiel-Grunow T, Kranz B, Wahl C, Staude H, Humberg A, Benz K, Krause M, Pohl M, Liebau MC, Schild R, Lemke J, Beringer O, Müller D, Härtel C, Wigger M, Vester U, Konrad M, Haffner D, Pape L, Oh J, Kemper MJ. Intermediate Follow-up of Pediatric Patients With Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome During the 2011 Outbreak Caused by E. coli O104:H4. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jun 15;64(12):1637-1643. [PubMed: 28329394]

41.

Garg AX, Suri RS, Barrowman N, Rehman F, Matsell D, Rosas-Arellano MP, Salvadori M, Haynes RB, Clark WF. Long-term renal prognosis of diarrhea-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. JAMA. 2003 Sep 10;290(10):1360-70. [PubMed: 12966129]

42.

Rimola A, Salmerón JM, Clemente G, Rodrigo L, Obrador A, Miranda ML, Guarner C, Planas R, Solá R, Vargas V. Two different dosages of cefotaxime in the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis: results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Hepatology. 1995 Mar;21(3):674-9. [PubMed: 7875666]

43.

Klompas M, Branson R, Eichenwald EC, Greene LR, Howell MD, Lee G, Magill SS, Maragakis LL, Priebe GP, Speck K, Yokoe DS, Berenholtz SM., Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;35(8):915-36. [PubMed: 25026607]

44.

Cohen MJ, Sahar T, Benenson S, Elinav E, Brezis M, Soares-Weiser K. Antibiotic prophylaxis for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients with ascites, without gastro-intestinal bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD004791. [PubMed: 19370611]

45.

Vermeir P, Vandijck D, Degroote S, Peleman R, Verhaeghe R, Mortier E, Hallaert G, Van Daele S, Buylaert W, Vogelaers D. Communication in healthcare: a narrative review of the literature and practical recommendations. Int J Clin Pract. 2015 Nov;69(11):1257-67. [PMC free article: PMC4758389] [PubMed: 26147310]

46.

Hill DR, Ericsson CD, Pearson RD, Keystone JS, Freedman DO, Kozarsky PE, DuPont HL, Bia FJ, Fischer PR, Ryan ET., Infectious Diseases Society of America. The practice of travel medicine: guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Dec 15;43(12):1499-539. [PubMed: 17109284]

Disclosure: Matthew Mueller declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.

Disclosure: Christopher Tainter declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.